The Challenge
A buyer sent one number and a quantity of three: XP56900600002, a spare-parts kit. The request did not itemize the kit contents and did not confirm which engine model it was going onto.
Kit requests arrive this way often. The number is precise, so it feels complete — but a kit number without its contents list is exactly where an overhaul job quietly goes wrong.
What We Supplied
We quoted the kit as new genuine supply for the number given, on EXW Shanghai terms, with the sourcing schedule stated as conditional.
We did not expand the kit into a contents list we had not verified, and we did not describe it as a complete engine overhaul set. Kit-content verification was put back to the buyer as the next step.
| Part Number | Part |
|---|---|
| XP56900600002 | Spare parts kit — not in the online catalog, quoted from the RFQ record |
The Outcome
The order was completed and delivered, and the customer authorized publication in this anonymized form.
What this RFQ teaches: price a kit precisely, and it still is not an overhaul plan until the bill of materials is on the table. If you are planning a top-end or major job, send the engine model and serial number and we will confirm what the kit actually covers before you commit.
Similar requirement?: Send your engine model, serial number, and part list. The same verification process applies to every inquiry.